Technical article

My $4,700 Mistake: Why I Now Avoid These Kennametal Carbide Grades for Interrupted Cuts

2026-05-18

When I first started handling cutting tool orders for our shop floor, I assumed the hardest carbide grade was always the right choice. Harder means tougher, right? It took a $4,700 mistake in September 2022 to teach me how painfully wrong that assumption was.

That order—for 300 Kennametal inserts, mostly grade K68, destined for a roughing operation on a large steel casting—looked perfect on paper. The buyer had specified the material, the geometry, the coating. I checked it myself, approved it, processed it. We caught the issue only when the machine operator called me over ten minutes into the first cut. Chips were the wrong color. Vibration was audible across the bay. Every single insert had micro-chipping at the cutting edge. 300 inserts, $4,700, straight to the trash. That's when I learned that 'harder' and 'tougher' are not synonyms in the world of carbide.

The Surface Problem: Unexpected Insert Failure

When a new tool fails on your first job, the instinct is to blame the manufacturer. It's tempting to think you got a bad batch. But after the third rejection in Q1 2024—this time on a $3,200 order using a different supplier—I created our pre-check checklist. What I found was a pattern of cognitive error, not a quality issue. The problem wasn't Kennametal's K68 grade; the problem was assigning it to a job with a high thermal shock load (interrupted cuts on a casting with scale). K68 is fantastic for abrasion resistance in continuous cutting of cast iron. It is a terrible choice for roughing steel with a hard scale (surprise, surprise).

The Deeper Reason: Confusing Hardness (Wear Resistance) with Toughness (Impact Resistance)

It took me three years and about 150 orders to understand that the real issue isn't about specific brands—it's about material science. The industry oversimplifies carbide grades. We talk about 'general purpose' grades without acknowledging the trade-offs. Here's the reality that a lot of beginners (and some experienced buyers) miss:

  • Hardness (Wear Resistance): Grades like K68 are great for continuous, high-speed cutting at high temperatures. They maintain their edge longer. They are brittle under shock.
  • Toughness (Impact Resistance): Grades like KC720 are formulated to absorb shock. They will wear faster in a pure abrasion scenario, but they won't chip or shatter on an interrupted cut. (not that I knew this before the disaster).

What I mean is that the 'best' grade isn't a number on a chart. It's a compromise between these two competing properties. Pushing a hard grade into an impact-heavy job is like using a ceramic knife to chop through a frozen chicken. It will work—once.

The Real Cost: More Than Just the Inserts

That $4,700 mistake was just the start. The real cost included:

Downtime: The line was down for 90 minutes while we switched tooling and adjusted the program. At our shop rate, that's about $1,600 in lost production time. Reputation: I had to explain to the foreman why the 'expert' (me) had specified the wrong grade. That 1-week delay on the order cost us some trust with that department. And Rework: We had to re-order the correct inserts (KC720 this time) with a 2-day expedite fee. That mistake cost $890 in redo plus a 1-week delay. Total cost of ownership isn't just the purchase price; it's the price of being wrong.

A Better Approach: Defining Interruption, Not Just Material

These days, I recommend a different starting point. Instead of jumping to the grade chart, ask: Is the cut continuous or interrupted?

If the cut is continuous (turning a smooth shaft, boring a clean hole), and the material is cast iron or steel, a hard, abrasion-resistant grade like Kennametal K68 (or even a coated PVD grade) is the right call. It will last.

If the cut is interrupted (milling a casting with a hard scale, turning a shaft with keyways), you need a tough grade. Kennametal KC720 (or similar tough grades) is designed to handle the abuse. It may not last as long as K68 in a perfect world, but it will survive in this one.

I also keep a note of the classic 'Kennametal company description' in my own head: they make a wide range of tooling systems, from standard inserts like K68 to advanced engineered solutions. But 'wide range' means you have to pick the right tool for the specific job. Their tech support can help with feeds and speeds, but the grade selection is on you (or your supplier).

This approach works for 80% of cases. If you are doing high-volume, low-variation work, you can optimize for wear life and cost. But if you're like our shop—handling a mix of materials and part types—you need to be more cautious. If you're buying a quantity of 300 inserts for a job that is mostly roughing, that is a red flag. Buy a smaller quantity of a tough grade first.

After 5 years of ordering cutting tools, I've come to believe that the 'best' grade is highly context-dependent. It's not about Kennametal vs. the competition; it's about the physics of the cut. I still kick myself for that 2022 order. If I'd asked whether the cut was interrupted, I'd have saved $4,700 and a lot of embarrassment.